|
WHO IS SINCLAIR BROADCASTING
COMPANY
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. is one of the largest and
most diversified television broadcasting companies in the country today.
Sinclair owns and operates, programs, or provides sales services to 62 television
stations in 39 markets.
Sinclair's television group includes 20 FOX, 19 WB, 6 UPN, 8 ABC, 3 CBS, 4
NBC affiliates and 2 independent stations and reaches approximately 24% of
all U.S. television households.
Sinclair's news franchise includes 37 of its stations which air local
news in 31 markets.
Sinclair, either directly or through its Ventures
subsidiary, makes equity investments in strategic companies.
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. was founded in 1986, went public in 1995
and is traded on the Nasdaq Exchange under the ticker symbol SBGI.
FROM
MSNBS
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6198935/#041012c
October 12, 2004| 9:42 p.m. ET Sinclair's sin (David Shuster) Imagine if
the CBS television network pre-empted "60 Minutes" this Sunday
and broadcast Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11." Many of you
might be thrilled. But many of you would be disgusted and outraged,
calling it a deliberate, misleading, and unfair ploy to impact the
presidential election at the very end. The Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
isn't CBS. But Sinclair does own 62 television stations, including 35
affiliated with the major broadcast networks. (20 Fox stations, 8 ABC, 4
NBC, and 3 CBS.) And Sinclair is ordering all of its stations to pre-empt
regular programming and run, as early as this weekend, a partisan
documentary about John Kerry titled "Stolen Honor." The film
attacks Kerry for his anti-war activism after he returned home from
Vietnam more than 35 years ago. Mark Hyman, a spokesman for Sinclair, says
"the documentary is just part of a special news event that we're
putting together." Actually, it's not a news event. The film was
released, (and picked apart) at a press conference five weeks ago. Some of
my colleagues have made an issue out of Sinclair's partisan history. 97
percent of their political contributions have gone to Republicans, they
sent a team to Iraq to find the "good news" the rest of the
media wasn't reporting, and etc. But my issue with Sinclair is in regards
to this film... and Sinclair's intention to run the film "as
is." Without a major overhaul, this film should be rejected... and it
has to do with journalism's requirement that you "get the facts
right." "Stolen Honor" has several prominent factual
errors: First, former America POWs are quoted on camera as saying "we
stayed two more years because of the demonstrators like Fonda and Kerry...
I figure they owe us two years." I have no doubt that some POW's feel
that way. But the fact is, the war stopped in 1973 when the Nixon
administration negotiated an end. History shows it was the lack of a
settlement before then, not the protests, that kept the North Vietnamese
fighting. Secondly, part of John Kerry's testimony as depicted in the film
starts in mid-sentence. "They cut off ears, limbs, heads..."
This editing makes it seem that John Kerry was making the allegations,
when the sentence actually begins with Kerry saying, "They said
they..." The difference is crucial. In reality, as opposed to this
film, John Kerry always attributed those dramatic allegations to the
testimony of other US soldiers. Thirdly, the film only features POWs who
say John Kerry's name was invoked by north Vietnamese prison guards. But
we've spoken to dozens of POWs who spent years in Vietnamese prison camps
and say they never heard John Kerry's name mentioned once. Balance
requires these opposing voices be included in a "journalistic
film." But, alas, this isn't journalism that Sinclair is practicing.
Some of you might be thinking, "Well, wait a second, Michael Moore
splashed his anti-Bush film in movie theaters across the country."
That's true. But there is a huge difference between forcing voters to buy
a ticket to watch a partisan film... and showing something partisan over
the free television airwaves. If Sinclair wants to sponsor "Stolen
Honor" in movie theaters across the country, more power to them. But
television stations are a different matter regardless of your political
leanings. Because remember, if it is Sinclair and "Stolen Honor"
this Sunday, would you be comfortable with CBS and "Fahrenheit
9/11" next Sunday?
Mr.
David Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc
10706 Beaver Dam Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21030
Phone: (410) 568-1500
Fax: (410) 568-1533
Email: investor@sbgi.net
Web Site: http://www.sbgi.net/
Dear Mr. Smith,
Please be advised that I am joining with VERANS IN DEFENSE OF TRUTH
AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS and millions of other Americans to
boycott all of your Television Stations and all of the advertisers
who appear on your stations.
I take this action because of your assault on the fundamental
principles implicit within the 1st Amendment of the Constitution
concerning freedom of the press, and because you are implicitly and
tacitly endorsing government policies that promote the commission of
War Crimes in Vietnam and in Iraq.
As Chief Executive Officer of one of the largest owners of
television stations in the country you are entrusted with a special
responsibility on behalf of all Americans to fairly represent the
news that effect our lives. Unfortunately, you have betrayed that
responsibility and by your specific actions you are implicitly and
tacitly endorsing the committing of war crimes by our nation while
attacking those who had the courage to step forward and told the
truth.
Your actions amount to defending the criminals and attacking the
victims of war crimes that were the direct result of policies by our
government. These are many of the same types of policies implemented
by the Bush Administration that led to the War Crimes in Abu Ghraib.
The recent announcement that your network has ordered all 62 of its
stations to air "Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal"
without commercials in prime-time next week, just before the Nov. 2
election. (as reported in the Washington Post) demonstrates that you
have no regard for either the truth or the public interest with
which you are entrusted as part of your licensing by the FCC.
Even worse, your promotion of this shameful and deceitful material
and your failure to discredit both the movie and the swift boat ads
which were created by closely related individuals, despite
overwhelming evidence that shows them to be false and misleading
amounts to an endorsement of War Crimes by you personally and by
your company. This is shameful, intolerable, indefensible and
un-American. The false misleading and slanderous show you are
promoting and the related "Swift Boat" ads are an implicit
defense of war crimes committed by our government and as a result
are a direct attack on the millions of heroic soldiers who had the
courage to serve honorably and bravely in Vietnam and to come
forward with the truth in Vietnam and Iraq.
Your actions amount to a defense and endorsement of those who we
know committed crimes and is an attack those who had the courage to
step forward and try to stop them. You are a disgrace to the news
profession and by your implicit and tacit endorsement of War Crimes
you disgrace all American soldiers who served honorably and
courageously in Vietnam, and those who likewise served honorably and
courageously in Iraq and Afghanistan.
As a result of your unconscionable actions I am boycotting all
of your stations and all of the Advertisers who appear on your
stations.
Furthermore, as you have engaged in a pattern of misusing the
license granted to you by the FCC, for example in April you ordered
seven of you ABC-affiliated stations not to air a
"Nightline" segment that featured a reading of the names
of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, I am joining with others in
demanding that your license be revoked at all of the stations you
own and will mount a public protest when your license comes up for
renewal.
Sincerely,
_____________________________________
ENTER YOUR
NAME HERE |
|
| BOYCOTT SINCLAIR
BROADCASTING |
| WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW TO
HELP THE BOYCOTT |
| LETTER TO PRESIDENT OF
SINCLAIR BROADCASTING |
| WHO IS SINCLAIR
BROADCASTING |
| FIND THE SINCLAIR
BROADCASTING STATION IN YOUR AREA TO BOYCOTT |
| WHY
SINCLAIR BROADCASTING, AND CERTAIN SUPPORTERS OF GEORGE BUSH
ARE IMPLICITLY AND TACITLY SUPPORTING WAR CRIMES. |
| WHY THE POLICIES
OF GEORGE BUSH IN IRAQ ARE AN IMPLICIT ENDORSEMENT OF WAR CRIMES |
| THE
CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS |
| |
| |
|
"In
February, 2002, the US president signed an executive order stating
that although the Geneva Conventions did not apply to al-Qaeda or
Taliban detainees, “our nation . . . will continue to be a strong
supporter of Geneva and its principles . . . the United States Armed
Forces shall continue to treat detainees humanely and, to the extent
appropriate and consistent with military necessity in a manner
consistent with the principles of Geneva.”5 This phrasing
subordinates US compliance to the Geneva Convention to undefined “military
necessity.” An August, 2002 Justice Department memorandum to the
President and a March, 2003 Defense Department Working Group
distinguished cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment, which could
be permitted in US military detention centres, from torture, which
was ordinarily banned except when the President set aside the US
commitment to the Convention in exercising his discretionary
war-making powers.3,7 These memoranda semantically analysed the
words “harm” or “profound disruption of the personality” in
legal definitions of torture without grounding the terms on
references to research showing the prevalence, severity, or duration
of harm from abusing detainees.25–30 Also, the memoranda do not
distinguish between coercive interrogation involving soldiers from
those employing medical personnel or expertise. For example, both
documents excuse the use of drugs during interrogation.3,7 Neither
document mentions medical ethics codes or the history of medical or
psychiatric complicity with torture or inhumane
treatment.25,26,31,32 In late 2002, the Secretary of Defense
approved “Counter Resistance Techniques” including nudity,
isolation, and exploiting fear of dogs for interrogating al- Qaeda
suspects at Guantanamo." |
 |
|
|
|