Tell Tale Extra:
Pooled to Portland
This week’s viewer mailbag included questions on the Great Northern-Northern Pacific-Union Pacific “pool trains” between Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon. Veteran Tacoma Division Dispatchers Jim Fredrickson and Dave Sprau lent some answers. Further replies are welcome!
Dale Saanders
December 27, 2001
I have a couple of questions regarding the Pool Trains that ran
between Seattle and Portland. What exactly was the arrangement between GN and
NP? How many trains were scheduled to run in the late 1960s? Was the UP
involved at all or did they run their own passenger trains?
D. T. Sprau
December 27, 2001
The answer to that question can get complicated. Here is the
simple version:
[The] GN, NP
and UP made an [agreement] that each would contribute one-third to the cost and
the [equipment]/labor of operating passenger trains between Portland and
Seattle. At the very end this [agreement] was easy to carry out because there
were three trains running, one in morning, one at noon, and one in evening out
of [Portland] and Seattle. Each railroad furnished a crew and the equipment and
operated one of three trains each way.
There used to
be more than three trains. In those cases, for example, the fourth train was
run by the three roads taking turns at it. I believe these periods were for one
year but I am not sure. In any event the end result was that each [railroad]
contributed an equal amount of miles and equipment to the operation.
All the UP
trains ran over [the Milwaukee] from Tacoma to Seattle Union Station, other
than that, the service was identical. When UP had their turn at the fourth
train, it also used [the Milwaukee] depot at Auburn, whereas the NP and GN
[v]ersions used [the NP/GN] depot. I believe this agreement came about as a
result of the [U.S. Railroad Administration] operation of railroads during
[World War One], but I could be wrong about that.
Dale Sanders
December 28, 2001
Thanks for the input on the Pool Trains. As always, answers to
questions bring up more questions.
Question One:
In the 1960s, did the NP always operate [Nos.] 407/408 pair of trains and did
the GN always operate the 459/460 pair of trains? What were the UP train
numbers for their portion?
Question Two:
What were the departure and arrival times at Seattle and Portland for [Nos.]
407/408 circa 1966?
D. T. Sprau
December 28, 2001
In 1960 [t]here was no No. 459. But, always in sixties for other
schedules:
GN operated 460
Seattle 8:05 A.M. – Portland 12:20 P.M.
NP operated 408
12:30 P.M. – 4:30 P.M.
UP operated 458
5:00 P.M. – 9:15 P.M.
UP operated 457
Portland 9:00 A.M. – Seattle 1:00 P.M.
NP operated 407
5:30 P.M. – 9:30 P.M.
GN operated 401
11:45 P.M. – 6:00 A.M.
GN 459 130 P.M.
– 530 P.M. replaced 401 on April 29, 1962.
Circa summer 1966, 408 [left] Seattle 11:15 A.M. [and arrived] Portland 3 P.M. [while] 407 [left] Portland [at] 5:30 P.M. [and arrived] Seattle [at] 8:15 P.M. However, you must keep in mind that back in those days the [railroad] did not change time, and adhered to standard time for schedules. This means that per [daylight] time the trains were probably running one hour later as far as customers believed, during summer time.
Jim Fredrickson
December 30, 2001
Excerpts from Seattle-Portland Pool Train Contract dated
November 19, 1924, effective April 1, 1925:
During the
calendar year 1923, the Pacific Company, the Northern Company and the Oregon
Company each operated two passenger trains each way daily between Seattle, WA,
and Portland, OR,...They believe that by operating five passenger trains in
each direction daily between cities (one of such trains to be limited as to
stops and upon a fast schedule) and a local passenger train in each direction
daily between Centralia, WA, and Portland, OR, they can reduce the expense of
passenger train operation and improve the service to the public. The most
practical plan for bringing this about, in the judgment of the parties, is by
pooling the earnings of such five trains and said local train, which they
propose doing if the consent of the ICC be given. Such trains, together with
any special trains the revenue and expenses of which are to be pooled, are
hereinafter for brevity sometimes referred to as “pool trains.”
The next section describes track ownership and the use of Portland,
Tacoma and Seattle stations and then it says in part:
Effective at
eleven P.M. on the first day of January, 1925, each of the parties will annul
its present schedule of passenger trains and will thereafter operate in that
service only such pool trains as are by this contract assigned to it, and such
special trains as it may be necessary from time to time to run.
Then it gets into schedules saying in part:
However, in the
preparation of said schedule, it is understood that in a general way the following
principles are to be followed:
Each company
with its power and crews and with its own equipment as far as same is available
under the requirements of paragraph seven of this contract, shall operate the
pool trains designated below:
The Northern Company
will operate a pool train out of Portland and out of Seattle at about 4:30 PM
each day, on a limited schedule of stops, and at as high a rate of speed as the
General Managers agree is practicable, such trains arriving and departing from
King Street Station in Seattle and Union Depot in Portland. It will also
operate a pool train daily between Portland and Centralia, leaving Centralia at
about 7:30 A.M. and returning leave Portland at about 3:30 P.M.
The Oregon
Company will operate two pool trains each way daily between Portland and
Seattle, arriving and departing from the Union Stations in said cities. The
first of such pool trains to leave Portland and Seattle at about the hour of
1:00 P.M. and the second of such pool trains to leave Portland and Seattle at
about the hour of 11:15 P.M.
The Pacific
Company will operate two pool trains each way daily between Portland [and]
Seattle, arriving and departing from King Street Station in Seattle and Union
Depot in Portland. The first of such pool trains to leave Portland and Seattle
at about the hour of 9:00 A.M. and the second of such pool trains to leave
Portland and Seattle at about the hour of 11:45 P.M.
Then comes a
lot about revenue and expenses....the Accountant of the Pacific Company is
hereinafter designated Pool Accountant.
Paragraph VII:
For the sole
purpose of equalizing equipment between the parties on the basis of their 1923
operations, there shall be determined the number of passenger car miles of the
various classes of passenger cars (exclusive of sleeping and dining car miles)
which each company ran in its Portland-Seattle service during said calendar
year 1923, and each company shall furnish passenger cars of the various classes
for the pool service so that its passenger car miles in the pool service shall
be approximately the same percentage of the total passenger car miles in such
service, as its passenger car miles in the Portland-Seattle service was to the
total passenger car miles in such service in the calendar year 1923. Each party
at its own expense will maintain the passenger cars which it furnishes for the
pool trains. Each party will furnish, maintain and operate at its own expense
any needed dining car in any pool train operated by it and will retain all the
earning of such dining car.
By the time I went to work in 1943 the pool trains had dwindled
down to one each way for each road with the night train alternating, each road
had it for a year. (The Centralia-Portland turn was long gone.) NP ran the
mid-day trains 407 and 408. In 1955 407 was changed to a 5:30 P.M. departure
from Portland so that the equipment from 408 could double back the same day. GN
459 became the early afternoon train leaving Portland an hour after 460
arrived.
GN 460 left
Seattle in the morning and came back as 459 in the evening until the 1955
change.
UP 457 left
Portland in the morning and returned as 458 in the evening. During the war they
were run in two sections, coach and Pullman.
For a short
time in the early [1950s] two additional mail trains each way were
established—403 and 404 in the daytime and 405 and 406 at night. I am very
fuzzy on details except in February, 1951, NP had the night trains and UP the
day trains.
Getting back to the contract:
Effective April
1, 1927, [S]ection IV of said agreement of November 19, 1924, is amended to
read as follows:
“Regular trains
having runs only in part on the colored tracks, such as the Pacific Company’s
Grays Harbor, Willapa Harbor, Buckley Branch, Yacolt Branch and East Auburn
connections, and the Northern Company’s connection with its Oriental Limited
operated between Seattle and Tacoma, shall not be considered pool trains nor
taken into pool accounts.”
All in all, it’s sort of a can of worms. If you would like to
come by and read contracts and review time tables, feel free.
Jim Fredrickson
January 1, 2001
The rotation of
which road handled night trains 401 and 402 was on a yearly basis, not three
months.
[The Northern
Pacific] did not use Traveller’s Rest cars on 407 [and] 408. It was
called a Parlor-Bar-Lounge car and they were the same as the Holiday Lounge
cars purchased for the Mainstreeter. Amtrak did finally use Traveller’s
Rest cars on Seattle to Portland trains after the demise of the [North
Coast Limited].
Prior to the
lightweight Parlor-Bar-Lounge cars 407 [and] 408 had a parlor car and tavern
car which was one of my all-time favorite NP cars. It was half lunch counter
and half booths which had red leather upholstery.
Mark Meyer
January 1, 2002
What about freight service between Seattle and Portland? Was there
reciprocal switching/service available to all customers on the line from GN,
NP, and UP? (Well, UP from Tacoma south anyway?) Did the GN and UP have locals
come on duty and tie up at intermediate points?
Jim Fredrickson
January 1, 2002
Customers could choose which railroad would handle their cars.
Northern Pacific served both the
Prairie Line and Point Defiance Line from
Tenino Jct. to Tacoma. When the Point Line was opened [], UP and GN had to choose which of the two
lines they would use. UP elected to go Point Line and GN took the Prairie Line.
In 1943 GN ceased operating over the Prairie Line and went to the Point Line.
There had been a lot of pressure from city of Tacoma to remove the long trains
blocking Pacific Avenue. GN retained some sort of arrangement to get business
from former Prairie Line customers with NP doing the switching and taking the
cars to Tacoma. UP had rights on the American Lake Line from Nisqually to Fort
Lewis. South of Tenino Jct. each road had equal rights to serve shippers
enroute.
Each road had
its local trains and the assignments varied over the years. Following is an
outline of some of the NP locals:
Tacoma-Portland
and Portland-Tacoma Locals which in later years were named Time Freights
instead of locals.
Vancouver-Centralia
and Centralia-Vancouver Locals which made side trips on the Yacolt branch.
Chehalis Switch
which originated at Centralia, spent most of the day at Chehalis but also went
to Napavine and Winlock.
Fort Lewis
Local from Tacoma to Nisqually on Point Line thence to Fort Lewis and return to
Tacoma.
Gate Local from
Tacoma to Olympia via
[the Fourth] and [Seventeenth Sub-Divisions] and return
via [the Third Sub-Division].
There were a
number of other assorted locals at different times such as the Kalama-Olympia
Logger, CT and O Turn (Centralia-Tenino-Olympia), etc.
Hoquiam
Highballs 694 and 693 ran via Point Line.
GN and UP had their own locals but not as many. Then there was
the Milwaukee between Chehalis Jct. and Longview Jct., and the Longview,
Portland and Northern from Vader Jct. to Longview Jct.
Train
dispatchers, Agents and operators were obliged to be impartial and not favor
one road over the other in dispatching or soliciting freight or passenger
business even though they were on the NP payroll. Each road had its own traffic
men soliciting business. This is a complex subject and the above is not meant
to be a definitive work on its history.
D. T. Sprau
January 2, 2002
When I saw Mark Meyer’s question about how the freight service
on this line was divided up, I started holding my head, thinking this would be
just about impossible to explain, but Jim Fredrickson has done a really good
job of it. I was going to answer and say something like “It is terribly
convoluted—each road to some extent had rights to joint switching in some
places but not in others, and what the NP granted the UP was not always granted
to the GN, or vice versa.” You might wanta keep print and keep Jims essay on
the subject because short of writing a book I don’t think anyone else will be
able to enumerate it any better.
I can add that at the Port of Kalama where GN, NP, and UP all had switching rights (as well as other places), the conductors on the respective locals had a gentlemans agreement between themselves that the first train into those places would try to switch out the business for all other roads and leave it where it could be gotten by those companies’ locals when they arrived. This may seem like a lot of extra work but if you realize that while the UP crew was also doing GN and NP work at Kalama, the GN crew would be doing the UP work at Ridgefield and the NP crew would be doing the GN’s work at Rocky Point, etc., etc., it all came out in the wash at the end of the day without all the cars being switched two or three times, and locals of different companies bunching up at the same station waiting their turn.
|
Author: John A. Phillips, III. |